Timeline for Why isn't reputation passed between Stack Exchange sites?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2011 at 0:36 | comment | added | barlop | shocking that somebody could ask such a question | |
| Jan 13, 2011 at 4:12 | history | edited | randomMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
double bubble up (and that's why there is a title and not a repeat button)
|
| Oct 6, 2010 at 6:00 | comment | added | nhinkle | This might even be a question for StackOverflow Meta, since usually questions relating to the entire trilogy belong there. I don't see any way to move it there though. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 21:01 | history | edited | Pylsa |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 4, 2010 at 13:41 | history | edited | Pylsa |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 4, 2010 at 13:22 | answer | added | Pylsa | timeline score: 19 | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 12:53 | history | migrated | from superuser.com (revisions) | ||
| Oct 4, 2010 at 11:52 | comment | added | tombull89 | becuase programmers do not necessarily make good sysadmins, and super users do not necessarily make good programmers, and visa versa. My rep is higer on SU than SF as I am more knowledgeable about using computers rather than administering. I could have a combined rep of 500 from SU and SF but on SO it would mean nothing. | |
| Oct 4, 2010 at 11:22 | history | asked | benjisail | CC BY-SA 2.5 |