Timeline for Requesting guidance on the use of backtick formatting with manpage names
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12 at 22:55 | comment | added | Canadian Luke | One rejected edit is not going to get you banned. | |
| Nov 12 at 19:15 | comment | added | AJM | Thanks, but I risk an edit ban if too many of these are rejected, which is a shame since I really do think they make a significant difference to readability. | |
| Nov 12 at 19:14 | comment | added | Canadian Luke | In future, I would suggest to keep doing what you tried. That's also how I got some of my early rep :P But ya, readability improvements should be suggested where possible. I see nothing wrong with what you tried | |
| Nov 12 at 18:50 | comment | added | AJM | Thanks - it also means the question and its answers are now consistent in how they format the manpage names. | |
| Nov 12 at 18:48 | vote | accept | AJM | ||
| Nov 12 at 17:43 | history | answered | Canadian Luke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |