Timeline for Why was my edit rejected if it improves the question's readability?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5 at 5:35 | history | edited | Robotnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
grammar; spelling;
|
| Dec 4 at 2:03 | comment | added | Ramhound | @Robotnik—Yes, I loaded the content into Grammarly, and it discovered five dozen issues. This does not even include how it would have rewritten some statements. The capitalization of the first word in every paragraph is weird. For instance, "Won't bother posting the manuals ...." isn't proper English. | |
| Dec 4 at 1:20 | vote | accept | Vylix | ||
| Dec 3 at 21:14 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Dec 3 at 19:38 | comment | added | Robotnik | @Ramhound so you would have "Reject and Edit"-ed in that case? | |
| Dec 3 at 17:46 | comment | added | Ramhound | One reason I would have rejected that particular edit is due the fact none of the grammatical errors were fixed. | |
| Dec 3 at 9:44 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Dec 3 at 9:40 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | AH, never mind, that was a concequence of reject and edit meta.stackexchange.com/questions/153403/… | |
| Dec 3 at 9:37 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I want to say community rejecting is the OP's rejection but I need to check on that before committing to saying that's the truth | |
| Dec 3 at 8:54 | history | asked | Vylix | CC BY-SA 4.0 |