Timeline for It’s annoying and hypocritical that reputation is split between StackExchange sites.
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2011 at 10:30 | comment | added | Grhm | @Robert Moir - I agree, and re-reading my comment I don't think I made that clear. If a user has proven a trustworthly member of one SE site - they should be deemed to understand the ethos a SE site and thus be allowed some of the basic privileges. I suspect this is what the +100 bonus for linking account is meant to achieve. | |
| Jan 13, 2011 at 6:59 | vote | accept | Alan H. | ||
| Jan 12, 2011 at 19:53 | comment | added | Rob Moir | @grhm - that's an argument that some of the numbers & priviledge levels might need tweaking, not necessarily one that all the numbers need merging. The rep is often used as a guide to someone's level of knowledge/trustworthiness, and just because I'm "worth" 8k of trust on ServerFault doesn't mean that my comments on SU about home computer setups are "worth" 8k, and it might result in a bad experience to a visitor if they followed such overinflated advice. | |
| Jan 12, 2011 at 19:38 | history | edited | James Mertz | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 267 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2011 at 14:45 | comment | added | Grhm | True, but coming to a new SE site and not having the abilty to comment on posts (like this), flag spam posts or simply upvote and answer that fixed my issue is really irritating. (I only have enough rep to post this comment due to @Benny's comment abourt re-linking accounts.) | |
| Jan 12, 2011 at 4:52 | comment | added | Benny | Well Said @KronoS | |
| Jan 12, 2011 at 4:45 | history | answered | James Mertz | CC BY-SA 2.5 |