Timeline for Should we elect more than 3 additional moderators?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011 at 15:53 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | +1 I would also love to see more nominees given a chance to see if they got what it takes, rather pick 5 mods and drop 2 and be left with 3 than pick 3 mods and drop 2 and be left with 1. But it should be competetive as KronoS mentions as too many new mods at once might not be good for the site either... | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 14:39 | comment | added | James Mertz | I agree with @IvoFlipse in that more regular elections may be a better solution... that way it's still done in a "competitive" spirit to bring out the best of the best. However there NEEDS to be more moderation as there is a greater volume of new users, questions and answers. | |
| Jan 19, 2011 at 13:16 | history | answered | Ivo FlipseMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |