Skip to main content
Super User

Return to Answer

Commonmark migration
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

I've actually had this same issue as well... As a work around until this is fixed I just add a second period to the number....

1..

 

2..

 

3..

This forces the markdown to treat it other than a list. You won't get indented formatting that normally comes with numbering but will at least make the numbers correct.

I've actually had this same issue as well... As a work around until this is fixed I just add a second period to the number....

1..

 

2..

 

3..

This forces the markdown to treat it other than a list. You won't get indented formatting that normally comes with numbering but will at least make the numbers correct.

I've actually had this same issue as well... As a work around until this is fixed I just add a second period to the number....

1..

2..

3..

This forces the markdown to treat it other than a list. You won't get indented formatting that normally comes with numbering but will at least make the numbers correct.

Source Link
James Mertz
James Mertz
  • 26.5k
  • 3
  • 37
  • 76

I've actually had this same issue as well... As a work around until this is fixed I just add a second period to the number....

1..

2..

3..

This forces the markdown to treat it other than a list. You won't get indented formatting that normally comes with numbering but will at least make the numbers correct.