Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Jeff Atwood
  • 24.3k
  • 1
  • 46
  • 83
added 159 characters in body; added 5 characters in body; edited title; edited title
Source Link
Tamara Wijsman
  • 57.7k
  • 24
  • 45

Can we get rid of the [microsoft] & [apple] tagcompany tags?

I don't think any of the following tags have questions that benefit them:

or, questions benefit from having that tag, , , , , ...

And thinking in the meta tag way, a question that's only about those tags would most likely be off-topic.

Let's discuss if we can obliterate them, or see how we can create more specific useful tags...

Can we get rid of the [microsoft] & [apple] tag?

I don't think any of the or questions benefit from having that tag.

And thinking in the meta tag way, a question that's only about those tags would most likely be off-topic.

Can we get rid of the company tags?

I don't think any of the following tags have questions that benefit them:

, , , , , , ...

And thinking in the meta tag way, a question that's only about those tags would most likely be off-topic.

Let's discuss if we can obliterate them, or see how we can create more specific useful tags...

added 10 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Tamara Wijsman
  • 57.7k
  • 24
  • 45

Can we get rid of the [microsoft] & [apple] tag?

I don't think any of the or questions benefit from having that tag.

And thinking in the meta tag way, a question that's only about those tags would most likely be off-topic.

Can we get rid of the [microsoft] tag?

I don't think any of the questions benefit from having that tag.

And thinking in the meta tag way, a question that's only about would most likely be off-topic.

Can we get rid of the [microsoft] & [apple] tag?

I don't think any of the or questions benefit from having that tag.

And thinking in the meta tag way, a question that's only about those tags would most likely be off-topic.

Source Link
Tamara Wijsman
  • 57.7k
  • 24
  • 45
Loading