Timeline for Legal basis for restriction of discussions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2011 at 2:38 | comment | added | user11574 | it's the basis for your conclusion that I'm criticising, not only the conclusion. If you think I'm wrong to do so, then by all means explain why you believe there's nothing to gain from allowing the discussions that have been being censored here, why you believe there's a realistic possibility that allowing those discussions to occur would cause damaging legal difficulties for Stack Exchange, and why circumventing DRM is unethical. | |
| Apr 25, 2011 at 3:04 | comment | added | Gilles | @sampa: No it's not. I really don't understand where you are coming from with your comment. I'm not implying to turn off SE, just implying that the restriction rule already applied by SE is a good thing. You are just pushing my original argument to an extremely ridicule conclusion that was never intended. This is just fallacious derision. | |
| Apr 23, 2011 at 2:07 | comment | added | user11574 | by that reasoning, it's probably better to switch off the Stack Exchange network's servers, slice them up and turn them into tin foil hats :) | |
| Mar 28, 2011 at 19:10 | history | answered | Gilles | CC BY-SA 2.5 |