Timeline for Reduce community wiki force threshold to <= 15 answers on superuser?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 22, 2010 at 17:57 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
Jul 29, 2009 at 21:14 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | Hmmm... Unfortunate. I guess I am always looking for that elegant "general theory of everything" philosophy; a solution that is so simple and all-encompassing that I could scribble it on the back of an index card. What you built here with 'Reputation' + 'Badges' + 'wide-spread consensus' comes pretty damn close. | |
Jul 29, 2009 at 3:58 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | unhealthy to have rep-denial tools in the hands of users who have a vested interest in denying other users rep. The algorithm makes it fair, not "I deem this wiki and therefore you get no rep." | |
Jul 29, 2009 at 3:30 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | True but, then again, trying to human-moderate Google is more analogous to drinking from a firehose. But on your sites, you have more than enough people willing and capable of keeping everything moving smoothly. They just need the guidance, tools, and checks & balances. | |
Jul 29, 2009 at 3:23 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | also, this system has been working quite well on SO for about 9 months. If your "question" has 15 - 30 "answers", it is not a specific question. It's a broad discussion. | |
Jul 29, 2009 at 3:20 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | "I have a bad feeling that if you try automating the whole process through a mish-mash of algorithms and constraints.." don't ever work for Google! :0 | |
Jul 29, 2009 at 2:08 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 2.5 |