Timeline for Flagging Questions as off-topic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2011 at 22:09 | vote | accept | wizlog | ||
| Aug 3, 2011 at 15:17 | history | edited | nhinkleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 212 characters in body
|
| Aug 3, 2011 at 15:14 | comment | added | DMA57361 Mod | Ah ha! I knew there was a better post somewhere, thanks @nhinkle I'll be starring that one for later. | |
| Aug 3, 2011 at 15:13 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | @wizlog see our response on Is it okay to inform users to stop promoting Apple.SE when a question is fine to stay here? | |
| Aug 3, 2011 at 14:09 | comment | added | DMA57361 Mod | Because we have different user bases @wizlog. If someone asks an (on topic!) Apple question here why should we be saying "Excuse me, sorry, you should go stand over there with all the other Apple guys, we don't want you here." If they've come here to ask us a question that we have always supported - since way before the creation of Apple.SE - then we should be helping them. Also, have a look at what I've said before on the topic. | |
| Aug 3, 2011 at 14:08 | comment | added | soandos | Because it is still on topic here. | |
| Aug 3, 2011 at 14:06 | comment | added | wizlog | Why should Superuser cover Apple software and hardware if that is specifically what the Apple portion of SE is designed for? | |
| Aug 3, 2011 at 13:57 | history | answered | DMA57361Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |