Timeline for How should my flagging change when I gain the ability to vote to close?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| May 20, 2013 at 14:52 | comment | added | slhck Mod | Since the queues have been working quite efficiently and any close vote cast on old questions will be picked up rather fast, there's no need to flag those. I therefore removed the last paragraph. Haven't come across anything urgent either, so if something's wrong, people will flag the question anyway, I suppose. | |
| May 20, 2013 at 14:51 | history | edited | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2013 at 22:23 | history | edited | Graham Wager | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed reference to vote to close chatroom as vote to close chatroom was voted to be closed
|
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:07 | comment | added | DMA57361 Mod | @DanielBeck I'd say it's probably less important, but still a little bit relevant (as we are likely to have more closers than reviewers, although I've no numbers to support this assumption). And as for "urgent", well, I'm not actually sure... it's been a while since I wrote this. | |
| Jan 8, 2012 at 11:58 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod |
Does the last paragraph still apply with /review and its close tab? What are examples of urgent problems that warrant moderator flags?
|
|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 15:45 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added highlights for better distinction
|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 15:41 | vote | accept | bwDraco | ||
| Aug 16, 2011 at 15:39 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 124 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 15:12 | history | answered | DMA57361Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |