Timeline for Why should high rep users get privileges?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Aug 22, 2011 at 21:51 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 136 characters in body
|
| Aug 22, 2011 at 21:45 | comment | added | slhck | Oh, I admit I didn't get the full picture. The gap between 3k and 10k is huge, that's for sure. However the limits depend on how well a site is balanced, so if you seek to change them we'd need to look into the data. | |
| Aug 22, 2011 at 21:43 | comment | added | soandos | I am more bothered by the inverse personally. Not that high rep users should lose privileged, but that lower rep'ed ones should get them. | |
| Aug 22, 2011 at 21:41 | history | answered | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |