Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

In such a case should the question be reopened? I am especially referring to this question herethis question here. You'll find that the question that's supposedly a duplication refers to a 404 page not found -- a dead link.

A quick search on superuser does not reveal any other obvious duplicates. Should this question be reopened in such a case since the reason for closing it is no longer valid?

In such a case should the question be reopened? I am especially referring to this question here. You'll find that the question that's supposedly a duplication refers to a 404 page not found -- a dead link.

A quick search on superuser does not reveal any other obvious duplicates. Should this question be reopened in such a case since the reason for closing it is no longer valid?

In such a case should the question be reopened? I am especially referring to this question here. You'll find that the question that's supposedly a duplication refers to a 404 page not found -- a dead link.

A quick search on superuser does not reveal any other obvious duplicates. Should this question be reopened in such a case since the reason for closing it is no longer valid?

Source Link
greatwolf
  • 2.1k
  • 10
  • 3

Question closed as dup but link to duplicate is a dead link

In such a case should the question be reopened? I am especially referring to this question here. You'll find that the question that's supposedly a duplication refers to a 404 page not found -- a dead link.

A quick search on superuser does not reveal any other obvious duplicates. Should this question be reopened in such a case since the reason for closing it is no longer valid?