Timeline for Should we edit out spam from spam posts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2011 at 17:28 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Only do this for blatant, obvious spam. Responses that could be legitimate answers (e.g. what I asked about here) should be left as is and dealt with by the diamonds responding to flags. | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 2:50 | comment | added | bwDraco | +1: Great idea, a superb compromise between the two. | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 23:54 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 12, 2011 at 23:45 | history | answered | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |