Timeline for What can I do with old questions that I think should be closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Dec 2, 2011 at 14:09 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 2, 2011 at 6:24 | comment | added | soandos | Makes sense now, thanks. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 6:23 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod |
You'll often find a user or two who disagree with your question. Leaving their votes around indefinitely will a) motivate others to vote on "borderline" questions (think software-rec where it officially entirely depends on whether it's "interesting") and b) make it much easier to accumulate such votes over a very long time. If five users on the site thought your question wasn't good over a 6 month period, is this really reason enough to close it?
|
|
| Dec 2, 2011 at 1:45 | vote | accept | soandos | ||
| Dec 2, 2011 at 1:25 | answer | added | nhinkleMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 1:10 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | its just the way its designed. see meta.superuser.com/questions/2285/… | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 1:05 | comment | added | soandos | Huh, why is that? | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 0:59 | answer | added | Simon Sheehan | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 0:58 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | well, if you really want something closed, there's always the vote to close chatroom. Since close votes apparently expire after a time, only recent close votes count | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 0:40 | history | asked | soandos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |