Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 4
Source Link
Simon Sheehan
  • 9.2k
  • 23
  • 35

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution. Maybe I need new glasses?

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution. Maybe I need new glasses?

deleted 81 characters in body
Source Link
Simon Sheehan
  • 9.2k
  • 23
  • 35

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution. Maybe I need new glasses?

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution. Maybe I need new glasses?

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

hinted at the size
Source Link
Mark Johnson
  • 2.7k
  • 13
  • 4

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution. Maybe I need new glasses?

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution.

Softwaretalk.info seems to be serving up Super User content without attribution.

Are they violating a content license?

Update

I missed the footer attribution. Maybe I need new glasses?

added 54 characters in body
Source Link
Mark Johnson
  • 2.7k
  • 13
  • 4
Loading
added 15 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Gareth
  • 19k
  • 2
  • 17
  • 21
Loading
Source Link
Mark Johnson
  • 2.7k
  • 13
  • 4
Loading