Timeline for The [failure] tag, a story of fail?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 23:05 | comment | added | slhck | Actually, I mentioned it here because Daniel mentioned it in a comment on the other one. For me personally, it doesn't have much of an importance. | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 22:54 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @slhck: No problem, it just made me wonder because you listed it in both Qs... | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 22:45 | comment | added | slhck | Ah, sorry, I actually quoted the wrong part of your answer :) Yes, you are absolutely right, I meant to say this with regards to the follower count. | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 22:27 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @slhck: So that means we can remove about everything past the fourth page of tags? That indication really doesn't make sense. The main point of tags is making it easier to find questions which are about similar subjects, so I do take it as the main reasoning about tags... | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 20:22 | comment | added | slhck | > You rather have to look whether it adds value when reading the question one-box and searching... – That's not the main point, don't take it as the main reasoning for removing a tag. I just mentioned it because a tag having followers at least indicates that it's useful to some people. | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 11:51 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 387 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 11:46 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 387 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 11:40 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 387 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2011 at 11:31 | history | answered | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |