Skip to main content
deleted 12 characters in body
Source Link
Gareth
  • 19k
  • 2
  • 17
  • 21

IMO

Volume should be used for partitioning, not audio. Disk format questions are far more prevalent.

Volume also has a specific meaning on the Windows side compared to partition. So using just parititonpartition may not be an ideal solution considering GPT will see further adoption in the coming future.

Then addAdd on the fact that Linux calls their partition manager the Logical Volume Manager.

IMO

Volume should be used for partitioning, not audio. Disk format questions are far more prevalent.

Volume also has a specific meaning on the Windows side compared to partition. So using just parititon may not be an ideal solution considering GPT will see further adoption in the coming future.

Then add on the fact that Linux calls their partition manager the Logical Volume Manager.

Volume should be used for partitioning, not audio. Disk format questions are far more prevalent.

Volume also has a specific meaning on the Windows side compared to partition. So using just partition may not be an ideal solution considering GPT will see further adoption in the coming future.

Add on the fact that Linux calls their partition manager the Logical Volume Manager.

Source Link
surfasb
  • 22.8k
  • 14
  • 8

IMO

Volume should be used for partitioning, not audio. Disk format questions are far more prevalent.

Volume also has a specific meaning on the Windows side compared to partition. So using just parititon may not be an ideal solution considering GPT will see further adoption in the coming future.

Then add on the fact that Linux calls their partition manager the Logical Volume Manager.