Skip to main content

Timeline for What’s up with the volume tag?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 30, 2012 at 17:50 comment added Tamara Wijsman @kino: I started first, feel free to verify. But doesn't matter, it's done now...
Jan 30, 2012 at 17:47 comment added kinokijuf I simply searched for [hard-drive]+[audio] and [partitioning]+[audio]. Are there any other tags that could be searched for? And it’s you that entered my progress.
Jan 30, 2012 at 17:46 comment added Tamara Wijsman @kinokijuf: I'm not doing so, that's indeed one that slipped in but I've been watching the others. It became a bit annoying that you entered my progress, thanks for doing it backwards / double checking. I guess we can consider this done...
Jan 30, 2012 at 17:44 comment added kinokijuf Don’t just retag blindly. You just tagged this question with audio.
Jan 28, 2012 at 21:02 comment added Tamara Wijsman @kino: I'll look into this next week, still in my exams now...
Jan 28, 2012 at 20:18 comment added kinokijuf Why don’t you do it?
Jan 14, 2012 at 16:05 comment added surfasb This is way more detailed than what I proposed. Never the less an excellent idea.
Dec 18, 2011 at 21:01 comment added Tamara Wijsman @MatthewFlaschen: However, it is not fine when there are no secondary ones. About it being too specific, for the same reason we don't have tags called office-word-subscript. So, the question is (as I listed in a later paragraph) whether we actually want such tag. Otherwise asked, does the tag make up for a large enough subset within audio or sound?
Dec 18, 2011 at 17:45 comment added Matthew Flaschen I don't understand what you mean "audio-volume tag is too specific." and I disagree with your claim that "question that's only about the tag audio-volume can't exist." This question would be fine with a primary key of 'audio-volume' along with secondary ones for 'windows' and 'keys'.
Dec 15, 2011 at 14:38 comment added Tamara Wijsman @DanielBeck: Woops! Yeah, corrected now. Logical drive should be equivalent according to what I read. Wikipedia lists both as synonymous...
Dec 15, 2011 at 14:37 history edited Tamara Wijsman CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Dec 15, 2011 at 7:44 vote accept kinokijuf
Dec 15, 2011 at 7:45
Dec 15, 2011 at 6:12 comment added Daniel Beck Mod +1 Getting rid of it is the only real solution. Logical drive, if equivalent, sounds like a good idea. Hopefully the synonym is obvious enough to not lead to mistagged questions.
Dec 15, 2011 at 1:41 history answered Tamara Wijsman CC BY-SA 3.0