Timeline for When should an up-voted answer be off-topic when the question is on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Dec 30, 2011 at 11:32 | vote | accept | Paul | ||
| Dec 30, 2011 at 9:23 | comment | added | soandos | Why do you think the answer was deleted for being off topic? (see here, but I don't think that is possible) | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 9:21 | answer | added | studiohackMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 9:21 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @Paul: What 7 comments are you talking about? I only see 4. What were they about? | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 9:18 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @soandos: Updated, there were no comments that told that it was bad. One suggested "uncooked rice" as a correction; even Jeff Atwood himself was helpful by adding two links about the uncooked rice technique. The last comment was a joke on cooking the USB, but that wouldn't have affected it. Looking at the total thing, I wonder why it has been deleted as it looks perfectly fine to me... | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 9:16 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 414 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Dec 30, 2011 at 9:11 | comment | added | soandos | Might help those who cannot see deleted posts to have an excerpt of the post edited into your answer. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 8:56 | history | asked | Paul | CC BY-SA 3.0 |