Timeline for "Moving to superuser" closure of threads
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 17:59 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Aug 5, 2009 at 23:11 | comment | added | Carson Myers | Moo is right, to anyone not familiar with the system won't know where to find the password, and the SU login page looks like there were invitations, and you can't get in without one. Someone who doesn't know about the blog, doesn't know there weren't invitations. | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 19:20 | comment | added | TheTXI | Because there were no invitations | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 19:02 | comment | added | Moo | No, I didn't - because the welcome page makes it look like a closed, invite only beta. If it were made a bit clearer on that page, then I would have. Why would I be seeking the password if I hadn't been invited in the first place? | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 18:51 | comment | added | TheTXI | Have you ever thought to try searching for "superuser password"? You made it to this site, it would have sounded like a logical thing to do. | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 18:49 | comment | added | Moo | Yeah, its really really easy - if you knew there was a blog, and that the SU password resided in it somewhere. So why isn't that advertised in any of the closure threads? It seems very much like its left hanging to the casual SO/SF user. | |
| Aug 5, 2009 at 18:21 | history | answered | TheTXI | CC BY-SA 2.5 |