Timeline for Company tag necromancy: The zombie apocalypse!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2012 at 22:11 | comment | added | James Mertz | I agree here that there are some tags that should be kept and are still relevant and useful (like the intel, amd tags). A top ten that the community votes on and agrees to remove is a good suggestion IMO. | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 10:10 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | By the way, when you deleted the tags mentioned in the other topic, did you deliberately not blacklist the tags? | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 8:56 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Apple is just as associated as razer with very few of their product lines. Macs and iOS stuff vs. mice and keyboard. But that aside, do you have examples from the list other than the previously discussed razer? Amd and intel are only somewhat useful because the company names are synonymous with their line of CPUs. And we have tons of more specific tags for both manufacturers. We could make those into actual synonyms for amd-CPU/intel-CPU or intel-architecture tags, which is likely how they're used. Then they would be actually useful. | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 6:28 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | see my edit for clarification | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 6:28 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 610 characters in body
|
| Jan 23, 2012 at 9:01 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | 87.5% agreement on this more thorough topic, 94% on my response in the older topic. In both cases only a single down vote. How much consensus do you want, exactly? | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 19:58 | history | answered | Jeff Atwood | CC BY-SA 3.0 |