Skip to main content

Timeline for Get rid of the [annoyances] tag

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 27, 2012 at 15:56 vote accept slhck
Jun 27, 2012 at 15:22 history edited Rebecca ChernoffMod
edited tags
Jun 27, 2012 at 15:22 answer added Rebecca ChernoffMod timeline score: 4
Mar 17, 2012 at 23:55 history edited Simon Sheehan CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Mar 11, 2012 at 0:04 history edited Simon Sheehan CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Feb 14, 2012 at 20:31 comment added slhck We all love the occasional fun on Meta, but there's no need to bump a post unnecessarily – just to add the tag we are discussing to remove. As a friendly reminder, which is definitely the first one you received, you should definitely consider taking your editing privileges more seriously than this. On Meta, and on the main site. @kin
Feb 14, 2012 at 20:26 comment added kinokijuf @slhck I sarcastically added the tag.
Feb 14, 2012 at 20:23 comment added slhck @kinokijuf Do you know what "sarcasm" means?
Feb 14, 2012 at 19:30 history rollback iglvzx
Rollback to Revision 3
Feb 14, 2012 at 19:22 history edited kinokijuf
edited tags
Feb 9, 2012 at 17:27 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/167660847752151040
Feb 8, 2012 at 8:28 comment added slhck @DanD. These comments are so … annoying!
Feb 8, 2012 at 4:01 history edited iglvzx CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 16 characters in body
Feb 8, 2012 at 2:58 comment added Dan D. the [annoyances] tag should be removed from all windows related posts as it is redundant there.
Feb 7, 2012 at 23:06 comment added mmyers This question should be tagged [annoyances]. Because bad tags are.
Feb 7, 2012 at 20:50 comment added slhck Sorry, I just had to use it!
Feb 7, 2012 at 20:50 history edited slhck CC BY-SA 3.0
added 113 characters in body
Feb 7, 2012 at 10:45 history asked slhck CC BY-SA 3.0