Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 history edited CommunityBot
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 history edited CommunityBot
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Feb 8, 2012 at 18:52 comment added DMA57361 Mod @OliverSalzburg that's fair enough, personally I'd also considered it so too original, with the notification being a happy side bonus. But as you can see from the links in my answer there was plenty of resistance to the @-removal/blocking when it was introduced.
Feb 8, 2012 at 18:40 comment added Oliver Salzburg After reading a bit more about it, I think my main problem was that I didn't see it as a tool of notification but rather thought it was used to signal to whom parts of a comment are directed.
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:34 vote accept Oliver Salzburg
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:33 history edited DMA57361Mod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 characters in body
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:32 comment added Daniel Beck Mod I seriously must be going blind :-/ Sorry about that.
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:32 comment added DMA57361 Mod @DanielBeck I've attempted to cover pinging multiple people in the last paragraph, and the 'fix' is to use backticks (which doesn't really fix anything 'cos the @'s then don't work!).
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:32 comment added Daniel Beck Mod The exception is the first comment to a post. It appears to not contain any @ validation, since only one user can ever be notified.
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:27 history edited DMA57361Mod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 42 characters in body
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:26 comment added Daniel Beck Mod It's no longer possible to even mention multiple users with the @. Trying to do so results in error, even if only one of them is an applicable recipient. Try to reply to this comment @-addressing e.g. Oliver and Ivo.
Feb 8, 2012 at 15:22 history answered DMA57361Mod CC BY-SA 3.0