Timeline for Old, answered questions bumped by newly posted answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Feb 28, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | slhck | When you review these answers, and you'll find a "I know this is an old thread, but here's my answer …", just delete it. Imagine you're a random visitor – would you care about that? At least I, when browsing for help, always try to read all answers, regardless of when they were posted. | |
| Feb 28, 2012 at 21:18 | history | edited | Ben Richards | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2012 at 21:08 | vote | accept | Ben Richards | ||
| Feb 28, 2012 at 21:04 | answer | added | randomMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 28, 2012 at 21:00 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | There is absolutely nothing wrong with it. Remember, this isn't a web forum discussing the news of the day. Contributions are intended to not only help the OP, but anyone with the same or similar problem (that's why we like more general questions better, in general, than specific ones). Obsolete topics are deleted, everything else always benefits from new information or alternative ways to achieve a goal. There are also several badges for answering questions late and getting upvotes (Revival, Necromancer), as well for editing old posts (Excavator, Archaeologist). | |
| Feb 28, 2012 at 20:55 | answer | added | nhinkleMod | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 28, 2012 at 20:45 | history | asked | Ben Richards | CC BY-SA 3.0 |