Timeline for Should not the "low quality posts" calibrated about answers containing just code?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2012 at 17:43 | vote | accept | avpaderno | ||
| Apr 26, 2012 at 17:43 | |||||
| Mar 3, 2012 at 19:30 | answer | added | slhck | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 3, 2012 at 17:47 | history | edited | avpaderno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2012 at 17:41 | comment | added | avpaderno | I didn't say that such posts are acceptable, and I agree that an answer explaining the code is much preferable. I personally explain the code I am writing, when I answer on Drupal Answers. What I wrote is what I noticed: Those post are not being down-voted, nor did the OP add an explanation after a comment suggested doing so. | |
| Mar 3, 2012 at 17:29 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | I disagree that such posts are acceptable. You can almost always explain to the OP what he did wrong and how he can avoid it in the future. Furthermore, you can point him to resources where he can look up the required information in the future. So no, it is a low quality post | |
| Mar 3, 2012 at 17:27 | history | asked | avpaderno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |