Timeline for Flagging posts that answer the question with something the OP has already dismissed
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 8:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Jun 10, 2012 at 20:13 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | superuser.com/a/410857/22317 -- it looks like these are considered not an answer right now. Let's see how it continues. | |
| Apr 11, 2012 at 20:28 | answer | added | randomMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 11, 2012 at 20:21 | comment | added | slhck | @nhinkle Thanks for trying to look into these kinds of flags more closely. I just hope I don't have to dig up this thread again ;) | |
| Apr 11, 2012 at 19:12 | answer | added | Ivo FlipseMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 11, 2012 at 18:39 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | @slhck we don't have the power to appoint other mods, but we do have the ability to request an election, which may happen before the end of the year. And if there were to be an election, I'm sure you'd be a top contender. | |
| Apr 11, 2012 at 18:38 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | I agree, in situations like these we should be deleting answers which suggest doing something that the asker already ruled out. I admit I've declined flags like this a few times before (chalk it up to being tired, I guess), and will make sure to evaluate them more closely in the future. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 22:00 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | No, I mean that I have to clean up your flags, even though you're perfectly capable of dealing with them yourself | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 21:18 | comment | added | slhck | @Ivo Yeah, we've been there. You know I'd be very devoted to this – if this is a concrete offer, count me in. I do hope though that by "little mess", you don't mean I'm doing stuff I shouldn't do? | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 20:55 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | No, I'd rather have them make you a mod so you can clean up your own little mess | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 20:53 | comment | added | slhck | @IvoFlipse In the future, instead of flagging, I'll just nag you in chat, okay? ;) | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 20:53 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | Clearly, you haven't asked the right mod then :P | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 20:15 | comment | added | slhck | Well, I flagged again, now it was marked "helpful" but not deleted. This isn't really a solution either, I'd say. | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 19:32 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | This has happened often too me too... | |
| Apr 10, 2012 at 18:59 | history | edited | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 506 characters in body
|
| Mar 7, 2012 at 22:58 | comment | added | slhck | Well, whether the issue is just a misread flag description or an actual policy saying otherwise, that's what I'm only interested in. Moderators are humans and make mistakes, it happens – I'm really not upset or anything ;) @Ivo | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 22:51 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | PS: I fixed the misunderstanding, the answer won't mislead the OP ever again | |
| Mar 7, 2012 at 13:59 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | The real issue here is that some moderators apparently don't always pay enough attention to custom flag descriptions. | |
| Mar 6, 2012 at 18:44 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | The real issue here is that moderators apparently don't pay enough attention to custom flag descriptions. If it were simply not an answer, we'd flag it as such. | |
| Mar 6, 2012 at 9:42 | history | asked | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |