Skip to main content

Timeline for The [touch] tag is ambiguous

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 7, 2012 at 12:30 vote accept Raystafarian
Mar 7, 2012 at 12:31
Mar 7, 2012 at 12:30 vote accept Raystafarian
Mar 7, 2012 at 12:30
Mar 6, 2012 at 20:10 comment added Raystafarian I updated the wiki for touch to reflect it is the touch command (once approved). The re-tagging can begin if it is deemed the appropriate action. The burninating should be off the table per this discussion.
Mar 6, 2012 at 18:03 comment added slhck … given that people actually read it :P
Mar 6, 2012 at 17:18 comment added Daniel Beck Mod This is a great example where a good tag wiki (excerpt) can prevent confusion.
Mar 6, 2012 at 16:06 comment added Journeyman Geek Mod superuser.com/questions/324108/… would be an example of touch-gestures, where there's no other tag at the moment
Mar 6, 2012 at 16:02 comment added slhck @Raystafarian It needn't be a synonym, really. If the [touch] tag wiki explains what it's about, that's generally fine. Let's split it up in to touchpads, touchscreens, what have you. I like [touch-gestures] as well, but depends on how much use we have for that.
Mar 6, 2012 at 15:58 comment added Raystafarian I can get on board with this, but it should be a synonym for touch-command
Mar 6, 2012 at 15:58 history answered Journeyman GeekMod CC BY-SA 3.0