Timeline for Can't we prevent some questions from being tweeted (at least until they're reviewed)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2012 at 10:11 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @DanielBeck: I don't see any benefit in the priority / voting, given that every approved question gets tweeted anyway. You could let the algorithm take events / meta questions first, but I don't see why we would need this for questions. Anyhow, this is for Stack Exchange to decide; whether pure randomization or community-based priority works better. If this gets implemented; because atm, it's just an idea... | |
| May 2, 2012 at 10:06 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | I agree with your general direction, but if the process will be better integrated to the site I want more interactivity. Make it a priority queue of eligible questions where 10k+ users are allowed to vote to prioritize, and give moderators the ability to pin questions to the top. The twitter job will tweet the highest priority questions in intervals, and remove them from the list. | |
| May 2, 2012 at 10:03 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | Corrected ask --> add in step 2. @DanielBeck: If by 10k+ voting you mean step 2 and by "next time" you mean step 3 then I agree. We just don't want the need for moderators to be there in every single time interval (which seems to be every 1 - 3h at first sight), which is what your last vote would literally imply (or I could have misunderstood that and you meant multiple of such votes). | |
| May 2, 2012 at 10:01 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 2, 2012 at 9:43 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Good idea. It'd also be useful to add to the 10k tools allowing 10k+ users to vote for their preferred Qs that represent the site well on Twitter, making it kind of a priority queue. Moderators could have binding "next time, use this Q" votes. | |
| Apr 30, 2012 at 21:36 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @IvoFlipse: If you can keep the Twitter from starvation, that's indeed an option to drop... :) | |
| Apr 30, 2012 at 21:17 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | If there's no approved question, do nothing, because we shouldn't promote crap for the sake of promoting | |
| Apr 30, 2012 at 19:24 | history | answered | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |