Timeline for Should we do something about the [osx] / [mac] distinction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2012 at 9:37 | comment | added | tripleee | For "something better", how about [macintosh]? I fail to see how you could keep up this distinction; my solution would be to migrate everything to [macintosh] and remove [osx] or leave it as a synonym (or possibly just allow the two to coexist). I dislike having [mac] because it's obviously the right choice for a question about MAC addresses, so it should be removed just because it's heavily ambiguous. | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 21:27 | comment | added | SSumner | You mean 47 for 100 of us... | |
| May 30, 2012 at 20:39 | comment | added | Michael Durrant | 4700 doesn't seem too bad to me. It's only 94 each for 100 of us ;) I'll be volunteer #1. 99 to go ! | |
| May 7, 2012 at 13:46 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | I'm trying to see what we can do; but I don't feel like 4700 questions can be reviewed reasonable, so we rather have to see at how we can automate parts of that given on certain characteristics. | |
| May 7, 2012 at 13:43 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg | @TomWijsman: Don't get me wrong, I'd love to learn about a less time-intensive solution. I just couldn't figure one out. | |
| May 7, 2012 at 13:38 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | Reviewing up to 4700 questions? :/ | |
| May 7, 2012 at 13:37 | history | answered | Oliver Salzburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |