Timeline for Are risqué avatars allowed? Failure of the Gravatar rating system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2012 at 8:11 | history | edited | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 380 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2012 at 8:04 | comment | added | slhck Mod | In the case of that user, I highly doubt they will ever visit again – in fact, the account is even unregistered. I don't see any risk in not suspending them – it'd be a different case for regular or currently active users. | |
| Jul 27, 2012 at 8:03 | comment | added | Brock Adams | PS: According to that policy you should suspend the user too.?. (Although, since he was a drive-by user, of a single, low-view question, maybe delete him instead?) | |
| Jul 27, 2012 at 7:59 | comment | added | Brock Adams | Okay consider it raised on meta. (^_^) Looks like (1) You dealt with it on this end, (2) Gravatar relies on users to self-rate their images, so (3) objectionable images are all on the user, according to Gravatar. | |
| Jul 27, 2012 at 7:58 | vote | accept | Brock Adams | ||
| Jul 27, 2012 at 7:49 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |