Timeline for Trying to reach 200 rep, then this bogus? edit rejection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2012 at 6:37 | comment | added | zero2cx |
I fixed the spelling. I did not attempt to fix the questionable grammar here, as I saw the questioner's intent very clearly. If borderline grammar still passes muster, you should leave it, right? The edit was not too minor, IMO. The edit comments: Fix title and spelling; add tag; add markdown;. I did a lot with little tweaks. I improved it. The Edit Rejector user rejected my edit, then edited it in the same manner but less comprehensively, leaving the title ambiguous whereas I did not. No improvement by that user at all when compared side-to-side with mine.
|
|
| Sep 26, 2012 at 6:36 | comment | added | slhck Mod | The OP didn't introduce any spelling error though, that is the main point. | |
| Sep 26, 2012 at 6:27 | history | answered | nhinkleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |