Timeline for Why do questions get closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Oct 14, 2012 at 9:44 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @Moab: It makes sense for you, but is utter non-sense for others. Whether it will break eventually or not is not the question here. It's actually pretty funny that you comment as you now demonstrate that you're implicitly focusing on recovery which makes it a con for you, if you don't imply recovery (and use proper back-ups) then it's way more important that it lasts longer which makes it a pro for others... YMMV, which is why this is subjective and the Stack Exchange network doesn't care about either opinion. ;) | |
| Oct 14, 2012 at 3:37 | comment | added | Moab | "Which one of both makes sense?" mine does, everything breaks eventually and data recovery on a SSD will be near impossible or beyond the pocketbook of mere mortals, "less" breakable does not mean it will not break. | |
| Oct 5, 2012 at 23:16 | history | edited | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2012 at 19:09 | comment | added | rtf | Exactly the answer I was seeking. =D Thanks. | |
| Oct 5, 2012 at 19:00 | vote | accept | rtf | ||
| Oct 5, 2012 at 18:41 | history | answered | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |