Timeline for Should we add information from comments to questions if it invalidates existing answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2013 at 1:10 | comment | added | Pylsa | @H.-DirkSchmitt No one wants you to delete your account! I certainly do not. I for one, value all members of our community equally. I have looked into some of your answers and they seem quite good and useful. However, we do have conventions and self-regulating systems in place that should be followed. Please do not let all this scare you away, instead, use it to discuss existing policies and help us come to a joint solution. This debate, as heated as it may become, is just another fine example of community-based regulation, even if we do not always agree with the outcome. | |
| Mar 14, 2013 at 0:58 | history | undeleted | user86064 | ||
| Mar 14, 2013 at 0:40 | history | deleted | user86064 | ||
| Mar 14, 2013 at 0:30 | comment | added | Indrek | "But it isn't acceptable if it invalidates an given answer." Why? Answers aren't sacrosanct. If the OP adds additional criteria to their question later on, then answers that no longer match those criteria become invalid and will either be updated, deleted, or left as is and possibly downvoted. There's nothing wrong with that. Yes, answering takes time, but it was your choice to invest that time based on nothing but an assumption, rather than asking the OP for clarification. | |
| Mar 13, 2013 at 23:36 | history | edited | user86064 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 201 characters in body
|
| Mar 13, 2013 at 23:16 | history | answered | user86064 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |