Timeline for Reviewing changes to the title
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Mar 26, 2013 at 19:05 | vote | accept | Brad Patton | ||
| Mar 26, 2013 at 18:19 | comment | added | slhck Mod | @killermist I looked at the last couple or so and IMO they're fine, but please look at this example. It would have been better to copyedit the body as well there, e.g. removing "Thanks", correcting grammar ("then its say"), etc. | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 16:17 | comment | added | killermist | @slhck Out of curiosity, would you say that the suggested edits I have made (affecting mostly title, but also sometimes fixing formatting/spelling/grammar in the body) are a positive thing, or am I wasting my time in trying to make the titles more readable (in addition to converting them into a question)? | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 15:33 | comment | added | slhck Mod | Yup. If a user goes around making title edits without fixing the remainder of the post, and those edits are just pure aesthetics and personal preference (rather than fixing a wrong title – as in, with a tag prefix or spelling error), then I'd consider that too minor. | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 15:32 | comment | added | Brad Patton | That's what I am leaning towards. I've seen one user just propose title edits and was looking for some guidance. Thanks. | |
| Mar 26, 2013 at 15:27 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |