Timeline for Why is "closed as not constructive" sometimes so destructive?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Apr 30, 2013 at 20:55 | vote | accept | hol | ||
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:43 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:43 | answer | added | allquixotic | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:40 | history | undeleted | slhckMod | ||
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:34 | history | deleted | hol | ||
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:20 | comment | added | hol | Agree my question is ambiguous. Yes, I wonder why this question was closed. Also I wanted to know if other share my impression that closures seem to me more destructive then anything else. I do not know about the reopen mechanism, maybe that would be the right answer to me on how I can deal effectively with such a situation. | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:15 | comment | added | slhck Mod | I'm sorry, I don't quite get your point. Are you unsure why the question was closed and would like an explanation? Do you have any specific arguments for reopening the question? Closed questions can always be reopened—it's just a matter of casting reopen votes. There's no need for voting on the close reason per se. I would like to add though that in this case I agree with the closure. | |
| Apr 30, 2013 at 19:07 | history | asked | hol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |