Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2


SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflowhttps://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflow

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklistStack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2


SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflow

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2


SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflow

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

11

22


  

SO seems to be tackling "Request"Request for Work"Work" type questions head on as per What should the predefined offhttp://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic reasons be for Stack Overflow?-reasons-be-for-stack-overflow

  

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and ZWrite a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2


 

SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per What should the predefined off-topic reasons be for Stack Overflow?

 

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2

 

SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflow

 

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

11

22


  

SO seems to be tackling "Request"Request for Work"Work" type questions head on as per http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflowWhat should the predefined off-topic reasons be for Stack Overflow?

  

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklistStack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and ZWrite a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2


 

SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/185142/what-should-the-predefined-off-topic-reasons-be-for-stack-overflow

 

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

First off, this is what our main closure and off topic dialogs look like at present:

1

2

 

SO seems to be tackling "Request for Work" type questions head on as per What should the predefined off-topic reasons be for Stack Overflow?

 

Questions must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved. Tell us what you've tried to do, why it didn't work, and how it should work. See also: Stack Overflow question checklist.

We see such questions fairly often too, with a long list of requirements that essentially boils down to: Write a complete script/macro/program for me that does X, Y and Z. No code included or anything to indicate what has been tried yet. Shouldn't we take similar steps like SO has (or plans to) and add a closure reason for such questions? What do you all think?

Source Link
Karan
  • 56.9k
  • 12
  • 16
Loading