Timeline for Is approving a edit for 2k users a bug or feature?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 16:53 | comment | added | studiohack Mod |
@somequixotic: just a note: switch your @ sign around, and put it with Scott, since slhck will get a notification anyway that a comment was put on this post. Thought, Scott is the OP, so it might not matter. Just an observation. Carry on! :)
|
|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 16:43 | comment | added | allquixotic | But wait @slhck, Scott has a point... what if the high-rep user goes directly to the question, clicks edit, makes changes unilaterally before approving the edit? they don't get rep obviously, but the edit will appear like they wrote it, and what would happen if 2 people approve the edit anyway and it has no changes vs. the latest revision (made unilaterally by the high rep user)? oh wait nevermind, answered myself, you can't edit a question unilaterally while there's a pending edit :P | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 16:31 | comment | added | Scott Chamberlain | "Being responsible for the edit" makes seance to me, thanks for explaining it to me. | |
| Sep 12, 2013 at 16:30 | vote | accept | Scott Chamberlain | ||
| Sep 12, 2013 at 16:27 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |