Timeline for Official stance on Facebook questions on SU?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:01 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Nov 25, 2009 at 0:54 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | It's the second link in your post above: superuser.com/questions/59692/… | |
| Nov 24, 2009 at 20:21 | comment | added | Troggy | Got a link to the closed question where Jeff quoted that? | |
| Nov 20, 2009 at 21:10 | comment | added | David Thornley | @womble: No, there's plenty of room for questions. SO is about programming (and so questions on programming for FB would be OK, but not general FB questions), SF is for admins, and SU is about your personal hardware and software, to put it loosely. | |
| Nov 20, 2009 at 19:17 | comment | added | Unknown Yahoo | The problem that I've got with Jeff's rationale there is that disallowing questions because they are "best suited on forums that specialize in X [website|product|etc]" kinda makes S* redundant... not that I'm a great fan of having SU fill up with Facebook questions, I just don't think Jeff's reasoning is solid. | |
| Nov 20, 2009 at 19:13 | comment | added | Troggy | I think what stuck out to me on that first question I linked to was "This is not a technical question, but it is 100% computer-related and does have a right answer" So then I looked at other questions and decided to get some discussion started here. | |
| Nov 20, 2009 at 19:09 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 2.5 |