Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY questionXY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues""issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear"unclear what you're asking"asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues""issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear"unclear what you're asking"asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY questionXY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

The question spends 95% of its text explaining one possible solution to the problem. The sole description of the problem is one word, "issues". There is not even an attempt to explain what those issuer are. I would, and did, vote to close the question as "unclear what you're asking".

How can we help you fix issues when we have no idea what those issues are?!

Maybe someone reading that question experienced the exact same issues and has a great solution. But how would they know?

It's a classic example of an XY question, where there's enormous discussion of one possible solution to a problem but no discussion whatsoever of what the problem is.

added 296 characters in body
Source Link
David Schwartz
  • 62.2k
  • 13
  • 5
Loading
Source Link
David Schwartz
  • 62.2k
  • 13
  • 5
Loading