Timeline for Close not computer related questions on StackOverflow instead of migrating them to SuperUser
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 7, 2018 at 1:23 | comment | added | tgm1024--Monica was mistreated | The more I hear people attempt to reason this out, including expounding upon the origins of the concept, the more I become convinced that migration of any kind from one SE site to another is a terrible idea. I already don't trust the SO crowd to close things properly (without pile-on and other knee-jerk stupidity), so I sure don't trust them to migrate anything properly. | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:11 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:01 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Feb 13, 2010 at 5:52 | comment | added | quack quixote | this is the way i see it. i have vague conceptions of what's better suited to SF or SO than SU, and vote to migrate as seems best appropriate. if it's a duplicate of a question already on one of those sites, it's the site's responsiblity to make that determination and close the migrated question. i honestly don't expect SO/SF users to be experts on what SU allows if it doesn't belong there, and seems more appropriate to SU, send it to us. we can close it or migrate to SF if necessary. | |
| Jan 27, 2010 at 22:53 | comment | added | Mehrdad | Fortunately, they don't have enough traffic to do the same with us! | |
| Jan 27, 2010 at 20:05 | history | answered | Shog9 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |