Timeline for Should somewhat trivial edits be rejected if there are a lot of them coming from the same user?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2014 at 14:52 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | For the record, the canonical sentence is “The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.” Your version doesn’t have an ‘s’ in it (and it unnecessarily has two ‘d’s). | |
| Jun 5, 2014 at 14:11 | comment | added | allquixotic | @Chipperyman Yes, I think you should continue to accept that user's edits. We've discussed his edits a little bit in chat, and the consensus seemed to be that, while he's a prolific editor, the contributions are useful. Just make sure he's doing something like Edit attempt #2 (fix all the things), and not just fixing one of several problems. | |
| Jun 5, 2014 at 14:02 | history | edited | allquixotic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 522 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2014 at 4:45 | vote | accept | Jon | ||
| Jun 5, 2014 at 1:58 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I'd also add, if they are recent posts, it makes sense to accept them, more so than older ones. Fixing quality issues early is a good thing. I tend to accept minor edits within say, the last 6 hours, or if its in the front page. | |
| Jun 4, 2014 at 21:36 | comment | added | Jon | Do you think I should continue to accept Bob Smith's answers? | |
| Jun 4, 2014 at 21:35 | vote | accept | Jon | ||
| Jun 4, 2014 at 21:35 | |||||
| Jun 4, 2014 at 20:51 | history | edited | allquixotic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2014 at 20:41 | history | edited | allquixotic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1345 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2014 at 20:35 | history | answered | allquixotic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |