Timeline for Let's bring [tables] to the table
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2014 at 11:16 | history | edited | Oliver SalzburgMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 19, 2014 at 22:10 | comment | added | gparyani | I should also mention that I've seen it also used as a typo tag for tablet. | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 7:21 | history | edited | Oliver SalzburgMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 25, 2014 at 13:01 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/let%27s#Contraction>).
|
| Jul 23, 2014 at 13:59 | answer | added | Excellll | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 23, 2014 at 5:13 | comment | added | Robotnik | @Excellll - Yeah I'd advise against [excel-tables]. It all comes down to fields of expertise. From a layman's point of view, Excel is software that deals with tables as its core function - so simply tagging with [microsoft-excel] should be enough if your question is about creating/modifying tables. Other largish subsections of the application, such as Macros, may require specialist knowledge that isn't relevant to the layman, or even necessary to use excel competently 80% of the time. Thus, having a [microsoft-excel-macros] subtag may be a good option, as it's a specific field of expertise. | |
| Jul 23, 2014 at 2:53 | comment | added | Excellll |
Upon review, most of the questions tagged with tables and microsoft-excel are not about Excel tables in the technical sense. If used properly, the excel-tables tag would be pretty sparse. Worse yet, the questions here suggest the tag would be misapplied pretty often.
|
|
| Jul 23, 2014 at 2:48 | comment | added | Excellll | It might be worth having an excel-tables tag as well, since the syntax for referring to data in Excel tables is different than regular range references. I haven't looked through the tagged questions to see if the tag is used for that, but there are conceivably some issues that relate specifically to this. | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 18:30 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/491651474305593344 | ||
| Jul 21, 2014 at 6:40 | comment | added | Robotnik | @slhck - sure, it was only a suggestion to split out the ms word tables :-) | |
| Jul 21, 2014 at 6:11 | comment | added | slhck Mod | The tag is quite meaningless; I'd just remove it altogether. | |
| Jul 21, 2014 at 6:04 | history | asked | Robotnik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |