Timeline for Question in tangled state with broken link
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 22, 2014 at 17:12 | comment | added | gparyani | I can still see the revision history of migration stubs even after they've been deleted, even if I don't have enough rep, but when I try to go to the question itself, I get a 404 error. | |
| Jul 21, 2014 at 23:13 | history | edited | MokubaiMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
| Jul 21, 2014 at 23:02 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | In that case I have cleared the migration history on the question and re-closed it. The answer it has might help users in the future, but other than that the question itself is not likely to get any attention. The original question would have been deleted, but would still be able to be undeleted if it warranted it. | |
| Jul 21, 2014 at 22:42 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | No, I’m not arguing that it’s a good question. I’m arguing that we shouldn’t say, “This question … may be eligible for editing and reopening on the site where it originated.” and then provide a link to the site where the question originated that doesn’t point to a copy of the question. If it’s been deleted, say so. | |
| Jul 21, 2014 at 22:35 | history | edited | MokubaiMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 197 characters in body
|
| Jul 21, 2014 at 22:28 | history | answered | MokubaiMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |