Timeline for Official policy for editing code in answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2014 at 7:04 | comment | added | slhck Mod | @akostadinov Well, we have edit audits, but they can only do so much. I don't know how we can improve that, other than requiring more reviews per suggested edit. | |
| Aug 18, 2014 at 6:42 | comment | added | akostadinov | question is how to discourage bad reviewers? I have an edit that almost completely removes my answer and changes it to something different. See meta.superuser.com/questions/8343/… | |
| Aug 13, 2014 at 21:48 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | This fits quite well with my preference. If the edit is not clear, does not explain the changes, changes the meaning or end result then it should be rejected. Keep the improvements, reject the radical changes. Pretty much business as usual if you play properly in the suggested edit queue. | |
| Aug 13, 2014 at 19:38 | vote | accept | Canadian Luke | ||
| Aug 13, 2014 at 19:34 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |