Timeline for Let's pull the plug on [plugins]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2016 at 4:51 | comment | added | Underverse | Good point Gordon. If someone is asking about firefox plugins then they should be looking at firefox-plugins, or confluence-plugins. The drawback there is that you can't then group all answers to the generic 'plugins'. Instead of a search of [plugins] it would be a search for [*-plugins ] which for some reason resolves to [vim-plugins] when searching from the search box in superuser.com. As an interim step using both could be tried, so an article would have [firefox] [plugins] [firefox-plugins] and statistics could be drawn to see which approach is better? | |
| Sep 4, 2014 at 5:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/507400704546578432 | ||
| Sep 1, 2014 at 13:22 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 29, 2014 at 17:08 | comment | added | Gordon Gustafson |
I'd always rather see a more specific tag, vim-plugins for example, so I say we 'upgrade' it's usage rather than eliminating it.
|
|
| Aug 25, 2014 at 17:02 | comment | added | Doktoro Reichard | I wouldn't call it vague or useless, but I find it hard to see the existence of an "expert" on all plugins, making this tag look more like a meta-tag. | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 7:02 | history | asked | Jon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |