Skip to main content
Improve formatting, grammar, punctuation, spelling, coherency. This is a great answer so I invested the time. :)
Source Link
Wildcard
  • 600
  • 2
  • 5

Only manufacturer and company tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that

There are two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics, that are okay for all products CPUsCPU and graphics card under the company Intel™ is OKproducts made by Intel Corporation. 

Nvidia is also kind of a special case... Nvidia Nvidia's only products (or at least their most popular products, since I haven't heard of anything else) products are their graphics cards. Over Over-atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. 

To prevent the broken windowbroken window of "why, "Why I can't use X company as a tag bug Nvidia can, but we have an tag?", let's rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't anotherit won't be a company tag, but a product tag.


As a side note (whileand while I added this, the post was apost's vote tallies were +12/-0), I would not only eradicate themthese tags, but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Only manufacturer and company tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPUs and graphics card under the company Intel™ is OK. Nvidia is kind of a special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) products are their graphics cards. Over-atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" let's rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.


As a side note (while I added this the post was a +12/-0), I would not only eradicate them but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Only manufacturer and company tags are problematic, specific products are not.

There are two tags, and , that are okay for all CPU and graphics card products made by Intel Corporation. 

Nvidia is also kind of a special case. Nvidia's only products (or at least their most popular products, since I haven't heard of anything else) are their graphics cards. Over-atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. 

To prevent the broken window of, "Why I can't use as a tag, but we have an tag?", let's rename it to , or something else. The objective is that it won't be a company tag, but a product tag.


As a side note (and while I added this, the post's vote tallies were +12/-0), I would not only eradicate these tags, but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/let%27s#Contraction>).
Source Link
Peter Mortensen
  • 12.3k
  • 16
  • 11

Only "Manufacturer & Company"manufacturer and company tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPU'sCPUs and graphics card under the company Intel™ is okOK. Nvidia is kind of a special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) productproducts are their graphics cardcards. Over atomization-atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" letslet's rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.


As a side note (while I added this the post was a +12/-0), I would not only eradicate them but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Only "Manufacturer & Company" tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPU's and graphics card under the company Intel™ is ok. Nvidia is kind of special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) product are their graphics card. Over atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" lets rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.


As a side note (while I added this the post was a +12/-0), I would not only eradicate them but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Only manufacturer and company tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPUs and graphics card under the company Intel™ is OK. Nvidia is kind of a special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) products are their graphics cards. Over-atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" let's rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.


As a side note (while I added this the post was a +12/-0), I would not only eradicate them but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Post Made Community Wiki by nhinkleMod
added 150 characters in body
Source Link
Braiam
  • 4.7k
  • 14
  • 18

Only "Manufacturer & Company" tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPU's and graphics card under the company Intel™ is ok. Nvidia is kind of special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) product are their graphics card. Over atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" lets rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.


As a side note (while I added this the post was a +12/-0), I would not only eradicate them but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Only "Manufacturer & Company" tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPU's and graphics card under the company Intel™ is ok. Nvidia is kind of special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) product are their graphics card. Over atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" lets rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.

Only "Manufacturer & Company" tags are problematic, specific products are not. I would say that two tags, intel-cpu and intel-graphics for all products CPU's and graphics card under the company Intel™ is ok. Nvidia is kind of special case... Nvidia only (or at least most popular since I haven't heard of anything else) product are their graphics card. Over atomization of the topic would be counterproductive since you would need a tag for each product on the Nvidia line. To prevent the broken window of "why I can't use X company as tag bug Nvidia can?" lets rename it to nvidia-graphics, or something else. The objective is that isn't another company tag but a product tag.


As a side note (while I added this the post was a +12/-0), I would not only eradicate them but blacklist them, since they keep coming back.

Source Link
Braiam
  • 4.7k
  • 14
  • 18
Loading