Timeline for How to help people who have lost their cookie?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
Oct 1, 2014 at 22:26 | answer | added | zylstra | timeline score: -4 | |
Sep 23, 2014 at 20:28 | comment | added | user201262 | Here, I have a spare one upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/… (sorry, couldn't resist) | |
Sep 23, 2014 at 0:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/514208346342060034 | ||
Sep 21, 2014 at 9:54 | comment | added | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ |
@RobinHood I agree that it is very difficult to actually find out whether the editor is the same person, but in this particular case, I think it was acceptable because it is a small amount of info, and I know it's a response to my comment. In cases where a lot of text is added/removed and the meaning is changed, it is more likely it is a random user. Also, the OP user id was 370412 and the editor 370434 - they're very close which probably means the OP figured out he lost his cookie and reregistered.
|
|
Sep 20, 2014 at 22:05 | comment | added | Robin Hood | I agree it would be REALLY useful to be able to merge unregistered accounts, but unlike registered accounts there is no way to PROVE it's the same person on the other end of the line, even an IP address is no guarantee (shared IPs, Dynamic IPs, public computers), it's important to respect the original account holder's rights. A silverlining would be it provides incentive to register. To me, even what this example user did (edited from another account) is not acceptable, because the new information should be treated as if it comes from a different person. Am I coming off snarky? | |
Sep 20, 2014 at 12:26 | vote | accept | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | ||
Sep 20, 2014 at 11:25 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 11 | |
Sep 20, 2014 at 10:37 | history | asked | ᔕᖺᘎᕊ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |