Timeline for Concept of "conditional" downvotes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2020 at 10:09 | comment | added | M H | Yes, good detailed answer, and answer score could also reflect some possble effect of stigmatisation, with (net)score of +7 c.12/2020, as the answer possibly received fewer views initially and also right after expansion, than it would have otherwise. | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jan 5, 2015 at 12:02 | comment | added | pepoluan | @Ramhound hehe... They were fair at the time given. I should've written, "no longer suitable/applicable". | |
| Jan 5, 2015 at 12:00 | comment | added | Ramhound | @pepoluan - I wouldn't say those downvotes were unfair...For instance in G-Man's case he published a low quality answer and only fixed it because of the downvotes. | |
| Jan 5, 2015 at 8:01 | comment | added | pepoluan | @Ramhound that unfortunately depends on whether the question is 'popular' enough that people will open the Q&A and thus upvote the answer. If the question is not popular, the answerer might be stuck with unfair downvotes forever. | |
| Oct 10, 2014 at 0:13 | comment | added | Ramhound | First your initial revision of the answer did need more explanation but you addressed it like you shoud so going forward you will get upvotes not downvotes | |
| Oct 9, 2014 at 23:03 | history | answered | G-Man Says 'Reinstate Monica' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |