Return to Answer

There have been lots and lots of discussions around that subject, especially on Meta Stack Exchange. At some point the focus was also shifted on filtering out low quality questions, because they also often attract low quality answers. This came with a change in removing the 1-rep penalty for voting on questions, and I think the majority of users was happy with that change, even if it meant that questions would be downvoted more often, without explanation.

There have been lots and lots of discussions around that subject, especially on Meta Stack Exchange. At some point the focus was also shifted on filtering out low quality questions, because they also often attract low quality answers. This came with a change in removing the 1-rep penalty for voting on questions, and I think the majority of users was happy with that change, even if it meant that questions would be downvoted more often, without explanation.

This I don't understand either. Your question is still there and got a decent number of views (given the fact that you posted it in what's probably the time span with the least amount of traffic on Stack Exchange). You do not ned to post it somewhere else. I mean, you can, outside of the Stack Exchange network. Nobody can stop you from doing that, and after all it might increase your chance of getting an answer. All arguments for and against cross-posting aside, that's a reasonable option here.

This I don't understand either. Your question is still there and got a decent number of views (given the fact that you posted it in what's probably the time span with the least amount of traffic on Stack Exchange). You do not ned to post it somewhere else. I mean, you can, outside of the Stack Exchange network. Nobody can stop you from doing that, and after all it might increase your chance of getting an answer. All arguments for and against cross-posting aside, that's a reasonable option here.